bracket
what should be said.

A curated collection of wild, outrageous, and hilarious profanity definitions and pronunciations for your churning, educational learning, and entertainment.

Results for "Leviticus 11:5"

Leviticus 11:5

Definition: And the coney, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he [is] unclean unto you.


Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from Leviticus 11:5. It’s a really important and slightly strange instruction about animals! Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, it says that certain animals are considered "unclean" to humans. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “And the coney…” - This refers to a particular type of animal called a coney. It’s a bit of an odd name! “…because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof…” – This is where it gets interesting. “Cheweth the cud” means they eat grass. "Divideth not the hoof" means they don't have a well-defined hoof (the part of their foot that points forward). “He [is] unclean unto you.” - This is the key point. The verse says this animal is unclean because it doesn’t meet certain standards – it’s not considered suitable for human consumption. What does this mean practically? For centuries, this rule dictated that humans shouldn't eat coney meat. It was a way of protecting people from disease and ensuring purity. The reason they were considered "unclean" is because they had a unique digestive system – their chewing process disrupted the natural order of things and caused problems. Why does it matter? This law is a foundational part of Jewish and Christian traditions, and it highlights the importance of respecting God's creation and setting boundaries between ourselves and the natural world. It’s about recognizing that some things are sacred and should be treated with respect. In short, this verse describes an animal – the coney – as being considered "unclean" due to its unique biological characteristics. --- Do you want me to: Explain a specific aspect of this verse in more detail? Give some historical context for why this rule existed?